Kreps says, “Teaching people what to look for I think is part of that digital literacy that would go along with thinking through being a more critical consumer of content.”įor instance, it is common that even the most recent AI models create errors or factually incorrect information. However, until further regulations are put in place, Dr. “I do think that this is going to become so ubiquitous, so ‘Grammarly-ed’ that people will look back in five years and think, why did we even have these debates?” Dr. Today, with AI assistants such as Google Smart Compose and Grammarly, using such tools is common if not universal.
Bloomberg spotify ai how to#
Consumers of generative AI can do the same as they did when they were first starting to learn how to use a piece of technology: Educate yourself. Digital literacy educationīack when computers were gaining momentum for school use, it was common to take classes like computer lab to learn how to find reliable sources on the internet, make citations, and properly do research for school assignments. This has especially been a concern as OpenAI’s first lawsuit was due to ChatGPT’s hallucination that created false information about Mark Walters, a radio host. “OpenAI doing more to think about what kinds of values it encodes into algorithms so that it’s not including misinformation or contrary, contentious outputs,” Dr.
Kreps gave the analogy of researchers using this stamping method to that of teachers and professors scanning students’ submitted work for plagiarism, where one can “scan a document for these kinds of technical signatures of ChatGPT or GPT model.”Īlso: Who owns the code? If ChatGPT’s AI helps write your app, does it still belong to you? Though studies are still underway, this could potentially be a solution to distinguishing between content that has been altered with generative AI and content that is truly one’s own.ĭr.
This helps to distinguish what content has and hasn’t been subjected to AI. One method of identifying such signatures is called “watermarking,” by which a kind of “stamp” is placed on outputs that have been created by generative AI such as ChatGPT. Sarah Kreps, director and founder of the Cornell Tech Policy Institute.Īlso: 7 advanced ChatGPT prompt-writing tips you need to know “The same neural networks that generated the outputs can also identify those signatures, almost the markers of a neural network,” said Dr. Researchers are studying ways to prevent the abuse of generative AI by developing methods of using it against itself to detect instances of AI manipulation. How can we hold ourselves accountable while we test AI?
Use AI to combat AI manipulationįrom situations such as lawyers citing false cases that ChatGPT created, to college students using AI chatbots to write their papers, and even AI-generated pictures of Donald Trump being arrested, it is becoming increasingly difficult to distinguish between what is real content, what was created by generative AI, and where the boundary is for using these AI assistants. What we can do now is educate ourselves on the challenges that come with using powerful technology and learn what guardrails are being put in place against the misuse of technology that holds enormous potential. Simultaneously, lawsuits against OpenAI are emerging, and the ethical use of generative AI is a glaring concern.Īlso: A thorny question: Who owns code, images, and narratives generated by AI?Īs updated AI models evolve newer capabilities, legal regulations still lie in a gray area. However, with these discoveries are concerns and questions about how to regulate the use of generative AI. With new discoveries about generative AI’s capabilities being announced every day, people in various industries are seeking to explore the extent to which AI can propel not only our daily tasks but also bigger, more complex projects.
0 kommentar(er)
